Slide 001: Visual Weld Inspection & Quality Criteria¶
Slide Visual¶

Slide Overview¶
This slide teaches students how to visually inspect welds against quality criteria, measure critical weld dimensions, and make accept/reject decisions. Visual inspection is the first — and often only — quality gate for makerspace welding.
Instruction Notes¶
Visual Inspection Procedure¶
A systematic approach catches defects that a casual glance misses: 1. Clean the weld: Wire brush to remove slag, spatter, and oxide 2. Inspect with adequate lighting: Use a bright LED flashlight at an angle — shadows reveal defects 3. Check the overall profile: Bead width, height, and symmetry 4. Examine the toes: Where the weld meets the base metal — look for undercut, cold lap, overlap 5. Check for surface porosity: Pits, pinholes, or clusters of pores 6. Check for cracks: Surface cracks at the weld center (hot cracks) or toe (cold cracks) 7. Measure: Use fillet gauge, ruler, or calipers for dimensional checks
Weld Quality Acceptance Criteria¶
Fillet Welds:
| Criteria | Accept | Reject |
|---|---|---|
| Leg size | ≥ specified minimum (equal legs ±1/16") | |
| Undercut | ≤ 1/32" depth | >1/32" depth |
| Porosity | ≤ 3 pores per inch, each <3/32" diameter | >3 pores/inch or any >3/32" |
| Cracks | NONE | Any crack of any size |
| Overlap/Cold lap | NONE visible | Any visible overlap |
| Reinforcement | Slight convexity OK | Excessive convexity (>⅛") or concavity |
Butt Welds:
| Criteria | Accept | Reject |
|---|---|---|
| Reinforcement | 0 to 1/8" above base metal | >1/8" or any concavity |
| Undercut | ≤ 1/32" depth | >1/32" depth |
| Porosity | ≤ 3 pores per inch | >3 pores/inch |
| Cracks | NONE | Any crack of any size |
| Root penetration | Full penetration preferred | Incomplete penetration for structural |
| Misalignment | ≤ 1/16" offset | >1/16" plate offset |
Using the Fillet Weld Gauge¶
The fillet gauge is a simple, essential tool: - Place the gauge against the weld with one leg on the horizontal plate and one on the vertical plate - The gauge measures the ACTUAL leg size - If the weld profile does not contact the gauge at all three points (two legs and the face), the profile is incorrect - Convex profile: Gauge contacts the legs but a gap exists at the face — acceptable up to slight convexity - Concave profile: Gauge contacts the face but gaps at the legs — the weld is undersized (throat is reduced) - Correct profile: Gauge contacts (or nearly contacts) all three points
Weld Profile Shapes¶
ACCEPTABLE: ACCEPTABLE: UNACCEPTABLE: UNACCEPTABLE:
Flat face Slight convexity Excessive convexity Concave
___ ___ ___ ___
/ | \ / | \ / | \ \ | /
/__|__\ /___|___\ /_____|_____\ \_|_/
Equal legs Equal legs Excess reinforcement Reduced throat
Beyond Visual: When to Seek Further Testing¶
In a makerspace, visual inspection is usually sufficient. However, for structural, pressure, or safety-critical applications, additional NDT (non-destructive testing) should be considered: - Dye penetrant testing (PT): Reveals surface-breaking cracks not visible to the naked eye. Relatively simple and inexpensive - Bend testing: Destructive test that reveals internal defects. Good for qualification - Professional engineering review: Recommended for any load-bearing or structural application
Key Talking Points¶
- Visual inspection catches 80% of weld defects — if done systematically
- Cracks are ALWAYS a reject — no exceptions, no matter how small
- Undercut and cold lap are the most commonly missed defects by beginners
- A fillet weld gauge costs $5 and pays for itself by catching undersized welds
- For structural applications, visual inspection alone is not sufficient
Learning Objectives (Concept Check)¶
- [ ] Perform a systematic visual weld inspection using a 7-step procedure
- [ ] Measure fillet weld leg size using a fillet gauge
- [ ] Apply acceptance criteria to make pass/fail decisions on 5 weld samples
Last Updated: 2026-03-19